Which of these sounds like your company?
The bill grows faster than usage
Costs rise while traffic stays the same.
No cost ownership
Nobody knows which team or product costs what.
Forgotten resources
Old test environments and snapshots keep running.
Oversized systems
Instances and databases are sized for rare peaks.
Full price for steady load
You pay on-demand prices for workloads that never change.
Savings that don't last
Costs creep back after every clean-up.
Don't see your challenge? Let's discuss your use case.
Book a call →How we work on your use case
Pick the challenge that matters most. We take it from there.
- 01
Analyse
your bill and usage
- 02
Prioritise
savings by impact and effort
- 03
Implement
clean-up, rightsizing, pricing
- 04
Keep it down
monthly reviews and budgets
Technical details
- Tagging, cost allocation and dashboards per team, product and environment
- clean-up of idle instances, unattached volumes, old snapshots and test environments
- rightsizing from usage data
- Savings Plans and reserved capacity for steady load, spot where interruptions are acceptable
- serverless for spiky load, storage tiers, scheduled shutdowns
- budgets, alerts and monthly reviews following the FinOps cycle
Flexible to fit you
One-off review, or ongoing
One account, or all
Quick wins first, architecture later
Your team implements, or we do
Performance checked after every change
Measured on the KPIs you set
You choose what success means. We measure it from day one.
Monthly AWS cost
Cost per product or customer
Share of costs assigned to teams
Savings Plan coverage
FAQ
It can be when resources run unused or oversized. Costs follow usage, so they can be brought down.
Clean-up and rightsizing often show in the next monthly bill.
No. We check performance after every change.
It depends on the complexity and scope of your project. We discuss it in the first call.
